I agree with you; lets make them happy again---but we should be careful, they cry so easily.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=9F3dUbqtvdc ________________________________ From: Ravi Yogi <raviy...@att.net> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 3:08:32 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Blues And I can understand why Curtis feels so protective of him :-). He's just being a protective parent though setting a bad example to other patents..LOL.. Now Vaj is another story, he is just a crook :-) On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Ravi Yogi <raviy...@att.net> wrote: >Bob, > > >Sure he is..this message is typical of his. But I have looked at Barry's >pictures on FB, he looks pretty naive and innocent. So he may be emotionally a >child, come across as vicious, harsh and offensive but he seems pretty >harmless. > > >I'm surprised at the naïveté of some of the TM'ers and I can see why they feel >harmed by their involvement with cults and Gurus. > > >So I like having him here and making fun of him. > > > >On Nov 2, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Bob Price <bobpri...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>Ravi, >> >>Was this King Baby's farewell speech? >> >>That was easy. >> >>________________________________ >>From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 10:34:01 AM >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Blues >> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" >><curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: >>> >>> BTW from now on, any missile Barry lobs your way is hereby >>> labeled a bang flag on a toy gun, and I will delight in >>> pointing our whether it causes you to get "freaked" about >>> it. But only to help you improve your skills understanding >>> other people's POV here. >> >>BTW from now on I doubt I will be lobbing any >>even "bang flag" missiles her way, or Robin's, >>or Bob's. I've done the "setup" for this week's >>experiment, and now they are free to react as >>they wish. Judy has only one more post this week >>in which to do so, so we'll see how attached she >>is to holding a grudge when she returns next week. >> >>It's been fun "chumming the waters" a little >>this week, but a kind of fun I will have less >>time for soon, so don't hope for more of it. >> >>When it comes to the people I have taken "bang >>flag" potshots at, I have either made my case, >>or I have not. Unlike them, I don't feel that >>repeating it ad infinitum is going to convince >>anyone of anything. They are free to continue >>to try to make any case against me they wish, >>if they'd like. As if -- if my assessment of >>them is correct -- they have any choice. :-) >> >>I really am hoping to "step away from the news- >>group" a little. As you've probably noticed, >>there is little said here that interests me >>intellectually all that much these days; I just >>can't identify with much of it. So I have (mea >>culpa) tried to fill the "interest gap" by >>perversely pushing a few easily-pushed buttons. >>But there's really no challenge even in that >>any more, since the buttons are SO easily >>pushed. Better I should do like the more >>sensible posters here and just lay low until >>and if something is said that I actually >>find interesting. >> >>Or not. We'll see... >> >> >>
