--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Alex, you were possibly privy to any "agreement" > > > > between Rick and Ravi, and Rick and Dan, trying > > > > to get them to keep their shit in their pants and > > > > not fling it around like monkeys. > > > > > > The Ravi situation was strictly between Rick and Ravi. > > > I did not get a subscription request; all I got was a > > > notice that he was now a subscriber, which means Rick > > > sent him an invite. I had no knowledge or involvement. > > > > > > WRT Dan, he subscribed and posted a string of profanity > > > filled posts, and Rick told me to nuke him. When I > > > received an attempted post by the then unsubscribed Dan, > > > I wrote back to him with this: "After that string of > > > profanity filled posts the other day, Rick told me to > > > boot you off FFL. You are no longer subscribed, and > > > anything you try to post will not go through." After > > > that, it was between Dan and Rick. > > > > I have no ability to read minds but perhaps Rick thought > > these guys deserve a second chance, no-one is beyond > > redemption I think. We all hope there is such a thing > > as personal evolution after all.... > > With all due respect to Rick, who in all likelihood > really is a nice guy, I wouldn't trust his powers > of discrimination any further than I could throw him. > > With regard to Ravi, when he first encountered him, > who many people here on FFL instantly reacted to as > being in the middle of some kind of nervous break- > down, Rick considered him enlightened or awakened > or self-realized enough to include in his BATGAP > series of interviews. In the time since, Rick doesn't > seem to have considered, when allowing him to return, > that even *courts* have decided that Ravi is too > unstable to allow him access to or even visitation > rights with his own children. He certainly hasn't > noticed that he's up to his old tricks with Curtis > and others here. >
Barry, how low can you go? Leave Ravi's family out of your personal grudge against him. Whether you're lying about him or not, it's none of your damn business and certainly none of ours. His private life has no bearing on his participation on this forum. Shame on you. > With regard to Dan, it is equally disturbing that > in giving him a "second chance" after a drunken or > insane profanity meltdown that even *Judy* felt > indicated that he was having a nervous breakdown, > Rick allowed him to come back and then left him on > his own remarkably like the Dean of MUM who left > Suvender Sem on his own. As a result, Dan was able > to make threats against several *more* people here. > > I, for one, am not impressed with Rick Archer's > "care and feeding" of the forum he created. As > I've said before, I think he's asleep at the > wheel. >
