--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > <snip> > > Oh yeah, and the doormouse thing is just totally condescending, > > there is no other way to spin that. > > It's "dormouse," not "doormouse" (dor = sleep).
Always appreciated. > > And of course, as Curtis knows, the phrase wasn't used to > describe Share (except by herself). Actually I didn't, I just dropped in and must have gotten that wrong. If so I apologize to Judy if I was characterizing her as condescending for a term she herself didn't use. > > > Here was your intent tell: > > "Intent tell," what a charming bit of psychobabble. NLP, > I assume? No, it is my own collage of the poker term as it applies to writing. It sounds so much edgier than "foreshadowing". > > > > > > > > "Here is the thing, dear Share," > > > > You kinda know what's coming after that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Supplying some mental floss for this exchange and just in case Judy's > > > > use of quotation marks is obfuscating, I'm sure it's not me she is > > > > quoting as I did not write those words. Or even think them. Maybe > > > > herself? Or someone from another decade? > > > > > > > > > > > > PS I'd rather be a supposed "pompous, reality-avoiding dormouse" than > > > > a rageful, reality-obfuscating dirty fighter. > > > > > > Here is the thing, dear Share, although you have obviously taken > > > exception to the metaphor of the dormouse as pertaining to you, it was a > > > rather charming, in an interesting way, image and not one to get overly > > > excited about. (See my photo of a rather adorable dormouse). On the other > > > hand, I know you can do better in your description of Judy so that it > > > encompasses not only your feelings (which seem to be hurt) as well as a > > > degree of truthfulness and therefore potency without the ugly-esh > > > negativity. I say this because I don't really sense that your "rageful, > > > reality-obfuscating dirty fighter" phrase as doing you the justice it > > > could if you were to dig a little deeper to find the one that is just > > > right. The one that fits your feelings right now but doesn't do you an > > > injustice. > > > > > > > > > BTW, The previous sentence shows the clean fighting way of using > > > quotation marks as the words enclosed therein were actually written by a > > > FFL poster.   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: authfriend <authfriend@> > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:10 PM > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to Judy & everyone -- writing for the > > > > Church of $cientology > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > My apologies to everyone including Judy for my part in > > > > > this disagreement. If anyone has questions or concerns > > > > > about my part in it or in the one with Robin, again my > > > > > request is that you email me directly for sake of > > > > > sparing the forum any further negativity. > > > > > > > > "Especially the negativity of having my mistakes and > > > > falsehoods called to my attention. I really hate that." > > > > > > > > > >
