--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > Oh yeah, and the doormouse thing is just totally condescending, > > > there is no other way to spin that. > > > > It's "dormouse," not "doormouse" (dor = sleep). > > Always appreciated. > > > And of course, as Curtis knows, the phrase wasn't used to > > describe Share (except by herself). > > Actually I didn't, I just dropped in and must have gotten > that wrong. If so I apologize to Judy if I was characterizing > her as condescending for a term she herself didn't use.
Uh-huh. It was, of course (as I suspect Curtis *does* know), a phrase I used. But not (as I said) to describe Share. Curtis (I suspect) thought he could con readers into thinking it was. > > > > > Here was your intent tell: > > > > "Intent tell," what a charming bit of psychobabble. NLP, > > I assume? > > No, it is my own collage of the poker term as it applies to writing. It > sounds so much edgier than "foreshadowing".
