--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote: > > I say this because I don't really sense that > your "rageful, reality-obfuscating dirty fighter" phrase as doing you the > justice it could if you were to dig a little deeper to find the one that is > just right. The one that fits your feelings right now but doesn't do you an > injustice. > > M: Perhaps a review process is in order for Share. She could send you her > posts before posting them, and they could be evaluated for how much they do > justice to her. > > I think there is more than a little Robin left in you Ann. (I hope that was > "just right".) >
Good one, Curtis. You got a twofer, a double play. You win the jackpot, a trip to Obfuscating Rehab for the irony impaired. > Oh yeah, and the doormouse thing is just totally condescending, there is no > other way to spin that. > > Here was your intent tell: > > "Here is the thing, dear Share," > > You kinda know what's coming after that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > Supplying some mental floss for this exchange and just in case Judy's use > > > of quotation marks is obfuscating, I'm sure it's not me she is quoting as > > > I did not write those words. Or even think them. Maybe herself? Or > > > someone from another decade? > > > > > > > > > PS I'd rather be a supposed "pompous, reality-avoiding dormouse" than a > > > rageful, reality-obfuscating dirty fighter. > > > > Here is the thing, dear Share, although you have obviously taken exception > > to the metaphor of the dormouse as pertaining to you, it was a rather > > charming, in an interesting way, image and not one to get overly excited > > about. (See my photo of a rather adorable dormouse). On the other hand, I > > know you can do better in your description of Judy so that it encompasses > > not only your feelings (which seem to be hurt) as well as a degree of > > truthfulness and therefore potency without the ugly-esh negativity. I say > > this because I don't really sense that your "rageful, reality-obfuscating > > dirty fighter" phrase as doing you the justice it could if you were to dig > > a little deeper to find the one that is just right. The one that fits your > > feelings right now but doesn't do you an injustice. > > > > > > BTW, The previous sentence shows the clean fighting way of using quotation > > marks as the words enclosed therein were actually written by a FFL poster. > >   > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: authfriend <authfriend@> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:10 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to Judy & everyone -- writing for the Church > > > of $cientology > > > > > > > > >  > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > My apologies to everyone including Judy for my part in > > > > this disagreement. If anyone has questions or concerns > > > > about my part in it or in the one with Robin, again my > > > > request is that you email me directly for sake of > > > > sparing the forum any further negativity. > > > > > > "Especially the negativity of having my mistakes and > > > falsehoods called to my attention. I really hate that." > > > > > >