--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> 
wrote:
<snip>
> Oh yeah, and the doormouse thing is just totally condescending,
> there is no other way to spin that.

It's "dormouse," not "doormouse" (dor = sleep).

And of course, as Curtis knows, the phrase wasn't used to
describe Share (except by herself).

> Here was your intent tell:

"Intent tell," what a charming bit of psychobabble. NLP,
I assume?




> 
> "Here is the thing, dear Share," 
> 
> You kinda know what's coming after that.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Supplying some mental floss for this exchange and just in case Judy's use 
> > > of quotation marks is obfuscating, I'm sure it's not me she is quoting as 
> > > I did not write those words.  Or even think them.  Maybe herself?  Or 
> > > someone from another decade?  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > PS  I'd rather be a supposed "pompous, reality-avoiding dormouse" than a 
> > > rageful, reality-obfuscating dirty fighter. 
> > 
> > Here is the thing, dear Share, although you have obviously taken exception 
> > to the metaphor of the dormouse as pertaining to you, it was a rather 
> > charming, in an interesting way, image and not one to get overly excited 
> > about. (See my photo of a rather adorable dormouse). On the other hand, I 
> > know you can do better in your description of Judy so that it encompasses 
> > not only your feelings (which seem to be hurt) as well as a degree of 
> > truthfulness and therefore potency without the ugly-esh negativity. I say 
> > this because I don't really sense that your "rageful, reality-obfuscating 
> > dirty fighter" phrase as doing you the justice it could if you were to dig 
> > a little deeper to find the one that is just right. The one that fits your 
> > feelings right now but doesn't do you an injustice.
> > 
> > 
> >  BTW, The previous sentence shows the clean fighting way of using quotation 
> > marks as the words enclosed therein were actually written by a FFL poster. 
> >    
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: authfriend <authfriend@>
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:10 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to Judy & everyone -- writing for the Church 
> > > of $cientology
> > >  
> > > 
> > >   
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My apologies to everyone including Judy for my part in
> > > > this disagreement.  If anyone has questions or concerns
> > > > about my part in it or in the one with Robin, again my
> > > > request is that you email me directly for sake of
> > > > sparing the forum any further negativity.
> > > 
> > > "Especially the negativity of having my mistakes and
> > > falsehoods called to my attention. I really hate that."
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to