--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > The reason you can't have a decent discussion about Maharishi's teaching is > > that you were never trained in it. So your perspective is like talking to > > someone at an intro lecture from the 70's. I find it very odd that someone > > so obviously committed to this teaching would never take the time to get > > beneath the most superficial perspective and take the many higher level > > intellectual courses offered. You took the intellectually lazy route and > > it shows up in every discussion. Combined with your combative nature it > > makes you appear very dull, distracted by any insignificant detail that you > > make a federal case about so you can get back to your routine of yelling at > > strangers on the Internet. > > The unpleasant truth for Curtis&TheTurq ofcourse is that > every Meditator and every Sidha has access to all of of > Maharishi's teaching, excluding the mantras. Always had.
I don't know whether that's really the case, Nabs. > When Curtis gets really upset and insecure, when his huge > Ego that want's to "call into question the whole goal of > the yoga systems including TM", he hides behind "I know > more than Judy because I was a teacher". Total crap of > course, nonsense taken to new hights, a sign of someone > REALLY lost on arguments. > > It's the same technique the Turq uses against Judy when > he gets really, really desperate, when his buttons has > been pushed so hard he doesn't know what to do anymore; > he draws the same lame argument that Curtis draws now. > > If the spelling is correct the word for this behaviour > is PATHETIC ! I agree that their behavior is pathetic, but I don't think things are quite so cut-and-dried as you make them here. I do have a better-than-average (as opposed to "superficial") grasp of what rank-and-file TMers and Sidhas are taught (better than some teachers, in fact, based on their posts). My familiarity with what teachers are taught that is *not* taught to the rank-and-file, however, is limited to the various beans that TM teachers (mostly former) have spilled in the TM forums I've been on, so I would never claim to have anything like complete knowledge of that (and I have no way of knowing how accurate the spilled beans are with regard to what Maharishi actually said). But it's beyond ridiculous for Barry and/or Curtis to pull the "I was a teacher and you weren't" bit when the topic is what the rank-and-file are taught. And it's nothing short of maliciously mendacious for Barry to claim that I've been "trying [my] best to pretend that the reality of the TMO and the things it teaches are the same as that presented in the intro lectures." Barry knows that isn't so; Curtis knows it was absolutely not so in our discussion, but he refuses to acknowledge this because he doesn't want to risk losing Barry's support.
