--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > Good old gullible Nabbie. With your intellectual endorsement, Judy's > knowledge credentials are now fully shored up. > > So when are you gunna show us your pictures instead of just being a cranky > critic who never exposes his own art to other people's opinions? > > (Hint: I already have seen some.)
In which case perhaps you realize that I, contrary to you, do not call myself an artist. I've never claimed to be an artist, I'm a commerzial photographer. You can howl in the streets and call yourself an "artist" as much as you please. I'm happy to sell my work and make a descent living. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason you can't have a decent discussion about Maharishi's teaching > > > is that you were never trained in it. So your perspective is like > > > talking to someone at an intro lecture from the 70's. I find it very odd > > > that someone so obviously committed to this teaching would never take the > > > time to get beneath the most superficial perspective and take the many > > > higher level intellectual courses offered. You took the intellectually > > > lazy route and it shows up in every discussion. Combined with your > > > combative nature it makes you appear very dull, distracted by any > > > insignificant detail that you make a federal case about so you can get > > > back to your routine of yelling at strangers on the Internet. > > > > > > > > > > > > The unpleasant truth for Curtis&TheTurq ofcourse is that every Meditator > > and every Sidha has access to all of of Maharishi's teaching, excluding the > > mantras. Always had. > > > > When Curtis gets really upset and insecure, when his huge Ego that want's > > to "call into question the whole goal of the yoga systems including TM", he > > hides behind "I know more than Judy because I was a teacher". Total crap > > ofcourse, nonsense taken to new hights, a sign of someone REALLY lost on > > arguments. > > > > It's the same technique the Turq uses against Judy when he gets really, > > really desperate, when his buttons has been pushed so hard he doesn't know > > what to do anymore; he draws the same lame argument that Curtis draws now. > > > > If the spelling is correct the word for this behaviour is PATHETIC ! > > >
