--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seekliberation" seekliberation@ > wrote: > > > > > > Regarding 'same old, same old', I can't say i've seen much > > > over the last several years that doesn't fall into that > > > category. I will say however, the last 2 days of looking > > > at posts has been somewhat atrocious. Rather than being a > > > deep discussion about some philisophical point, it turned > > > into a ridiculous game of ping-pong. > > > > You really can't have a "deep discussion about some > > philosophical point" when one of the parties to the > > discussion refuses to make a straightforward case, > > resisting all attempts to level the playing field. > > Bingo! Did someone just say Bingo!? Thanks Judy for hi > lighting the essence of any interaction with you.
Oh, you miswrote, Steve. You meant to say "any interaction with Curtis." This is why you are undefeated in > the annals of internet discussion groups. > I ask, oh good people of internet forums, would this make a good > epitaph? > > > (Not to mention when one of that party's allies > > decides to jump in and distort the playing field > > beyond all recognition because he has an > > obsessive grudge against the other party.) > > > > > > > > But then again, nothing can be great all the time. There will > always be dull moments, exciting moments, and mediocre moments in > anything. FFL is certainly no exception, and therefore nothing to > really complain about. > > > > > > seekliberation > > >
