Look, look.. Stop being silly Curtis - read my post and Judy's again - yes we both dislike you as your sorry ass stands today, we both enjoy attacking you and we WERE attacking you but, but, BUT.........entirely different perspectives, different points. But you have to keep obscuring, keep switching the context - good job on that. I have responded to mine, Judy surely will whip your ass tomorrow..LOL.
Bullshit on disassociation - I think you are pretty ignorant based upon what you rant here, little knowledge as Judy says on your ability to judge and your experiences comparing it to altered states of consciousness. If I were you I would keep my ignorant fucking mouth shut. FYI - Sorry to disturb you in your fantasy la la land, but I have never shied away from acknowledging that I abuse and insult people. On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:02 PM, curtisdeltablues < curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ** > > > Do a search on the numerous times I have discussed dissociation, often > about my own experiences with it, to see why Judy didn't quote from any of > them. but instead, went to Wiki to not only change the context, but to > change the actual term to depersonalization and dereaization to make it all > sound more dramatic. > > My point had nothing to do with that, but I never got to it because you > followed Judy down the rabbit hole. (tip of the hat to Richard) > > When you dissociate from your emotions here as reflected in your language, > you start your abusive routine. It is very obvious to me. > > Dissociation (as I have discussed at length here, has a useful function in > certain contexts, and is not pathological unless you are stuck in it and > can't choose to associate into our feelings. My point to you had nothing to > do with that extreme of the spectrum. > > You are too busy doing troll work to have a discussion with Ravi, so I > immediately lost interest. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > wrote: > > > > Well stop obscuring my point. > > > > I said - Your response to Emily was cold, hostile, self-righteous and > > contemptuous. You didn't address anything about misinterpretation in your > > response. Where was the acknowledgement of Emily's POV? Was she a robot - > > was she not entitled to her feelings - unless you think she's lying about > > her feelings? Since this in light of Share's accusation perhaps referring > > to Robin's responses may help? > > > > You know what Curtis baby - you don't show any fucking sensitivity (did > you > > even read the sample response?) and that's a pattern with you - remember > > your post on disassociation. No - there's no revealing of my shallow > agenda > > - it's revealing of your patterns. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:25 PM, curtisdeltablues < > > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > Sensitive Ravi to the rescue. Right, got it. > > > > > > It was not a gang rape lyric, that was a misinterpretation. > > > > > > But that distinction will not interest you because you are a troll and > > > your posting intentions are unfriendly. > > > > > > You think you are "getting" a person Judy does not like and winning her > > > approval, but instead you are revealing yourself and your shallow > agenda. > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I think a lot of men have incredible difficulty expressing empathy > but > > > this > > > > one seems very cold-hearted and dismissive, as if the person asking > these > > > > questions had no right to these feelings and/or was irrational for > even > > > > trying to communicate that, viz "I have no idea why you write any of > > > this" > > > > - I wonder if this is narcissism, disassociation and/or psychopathy? > > > > > > > > Anyway here's one way I would respond assuming I was innocent. > > > > > > > > "Dear Emily - I am so sorry to hear that you were disturbed by the > gang > > > > rape lyrics. Looking back it was probably not a good idea to post it > or I > > > > should have cautioned you that the lyrics had references to gang > rape - > > > in > > > > this day and age one should always be aware that there could be some > who > > > > would get affected by that, especially victims and family members of > > > > victims harmed by sexual violence. But rest assured Emily I had no > > > > intentions to PR you, my intentions was just to share some music > with a > > > > fellow music-lover and in retrospect I should have known that some > people > > > > may have found it offensive. I hope you are feeling better." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:51 PM, authfriend <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, as much as Curtis asserts that his goal is "to be > > > > > understood by other people here," it doesn't seem that > > > > > he is willing to respond to the question Emily asked > > > > > him: Why did he make a point of calling her attention > > > > > to a verse about gang rape? Instead he just wipes out > > > > > her context as if it had never existed. > > > > > > > > > > Obviously she found it disturbing. Why wouldn't he > > > > > respond--unless that's what he wanted, for her to be > > > > > disturbed? > > > > > > > > > > Man, there are very creepy things going on on this > > > > > forum lately. > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I have no idea why you would write any of this. > > > > > > > > > > > > I shared music with you that I perform in my show. It has no > meaning > > > > > directed toward you except I thought I was sharing interesting > music > > > with > > > > > another music lover. > > > > > > > > > > > > To be clear: There are no hidden messages or meanings directed > toward > > > > > you by any music I ever shared with you on this board, ever. There > are > > > no > > > > > hidden messages toward you in anything I have ever written to you > > > here. I > > > > > have tried to be clear about what I meant at all times because my > goal > > > is > > > > > to be understood by other people here. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lets chill on sharing music. It apparently isn't working. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" > > > <emilymae.reyn@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Curtis: Hey, I was just responding to Xeno on his > psychological > > > rape > > > > > > > post and this spontaneously came off my fingertips: > > > > > > > "nor did I [feel psychologically raped] recently, when Curtis > > > referred > > > > > > > me to the gang rape lyrics of a song he posted. I probably > should > > > have > > > > > > > then, come to think about it, but I just figured I had crossed > his > > > > > > > boundary again, unknowingly, like I did the first time. I was > > > teasing > > > > > > > him; he got angry...." > > > > > > > God bless it, were you trying to publicly PR me? Did I not > pick up > > > on > > > > > > > that? I'm kind of slow on the uptake sometimes, it's true. You > > > never > > > > > > > did explain to me why you referred me to the lyrics you did. > If you > > > > > > > were, than I say "Fuck you, man, fuck you." If you weren't than > > > maybe > > > > > > > you could explain it to me. Am I right in my assumption above? > > > > > > > I know you ain't a country guy, in terms of music, but here's a > > > song > > > > > > > from George Jones - RIP, that may bring you back to a > performance > > > > > period > > > > > > > that would be best left forever. > > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onfce-UNmmE > > > > > > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onfce-UNmmE> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
