--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it > > > > promotes self-will and not the will of the unified field. > > > > > > The unified field has a will? Far out. > > > > Isn't it just a *trip* that so many people assume > > it does? > > Actually it gives me the creeps! > > I mean the UF - if it exists - is simply what the universe > is before it gets all random and foamy and *long* before > the chaos becomes visible as the whirly subatomic stuff we > all know and love. > > Ascribing intentions to it is absurd but worshipping > it is deeply weird.
FWIW, I've never run across either idea in the TM context. > I always used to wonder what the unified > field charts were trying to say, it was clear that they > had an intention beyond simply informing the observer > what the TMO thought was going on. Um, I don't think the charts had anything to do with the Unified Field having intentions or with worshipping it.
