--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it > > > > > promotes self-will and not the will of the unified field. > > > > > > > > The unified field has a will? Far out. > > > > > > Isn't it just a *trip* that so many people assume > > > it does? > > > > Actually it gives me the creeps! > > > > I mean the UF - if it exists - is simply what the universe > > is before it gets all random and foamy and *long* before > > the chaos becomes visible as the whirly subatomic stuff we > > all know and love. > > > > Ascribing intentions to it is absurd but worshipping > > it is deeply weird. > > FWIW, I've never run across either idea in the TM > context.
Then you weren't paying attention. It's the foundation of everything in SCI. It is organising the universe in perfect order and without a problem. It is Natural Law itself and it is consciousness and therefore it is us and apparently we can influence it. As for worshipping it, have a word with Buck. All TM concepts about the UF are religious ideas transposed into modern scientific terms as though they are the same thing and they are not. Someone rang the NLP office once and asked what natural law actually was and I didn't know, which was a bit crap, so I decided to find out: Natural Law is god's will, the unified field is the field of all possibilities governed by natural law. You can't tell the public that though so we have all sorts of diversionary ways of saying it like "the best way to do things" or "what your body wants you to do but your mind sometimes gets wrong" that sort of anodyne crap that diverts from the real message that we knew everything and could transform the world if only people would listen and hop along. > > I always used to wonder what the unified > > field charts were trying to say, it was clear that they > > had an intention beyond simply informing the observer > > what the TMO thought was going on. > > Um, I don't think the charts had anything to do with > the Unified Field having intentions or with worshipping > it. >
