--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote: > > > "As Hagelin describes the unified field, It is an ocean of Intelligence. > As such, It is the Observer, the Process of Observing, and the > Observed. > > This universe and any other universes which come out of the Unified > Field cannot be random and chaotic since It is Intelligence. In > particular, this universe is based on Natural Laws in which the > subatomic particles and galaxies are subjected to." > > > If Hagelin is the arbiter of reality, we really are all screwed. >
MJ, And you're basing your statement based on whose authority? If it's you, why should we believe you? Do you have the suitable credentials to back up your statements? JR > > > ________________________________ > From: John <jr_esq@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:09 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel > Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S > > > > Â > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it > > > > > promotes self-will and not the will of the unified field. > > > > > > > > The unified field has a will? Far out. > > > > > > Isn't it just a *trip* that so many people assume > > > it does? > > > > Actually it gives me the creeps! > > > > I mean the UF - if it exists - is simply what the universe > > is before it gets all random and foamy and *long* before > > the chaos becomes visible as the whirly subatomic stuff we > > all know and love. > > As Hagelin describes the unified field, It is an ocean of Intelligence. As > such, It is the Observer, the Process of Observing, and the Observed. > > This universe and any other universes which come out of the Unified Field > cannot be random and chaotic since It is Intelligence. In particular, this > universe is based on Natural Laws in which the subatomic particles and > galaxies are subjected to. > > > > > Ascribing intentions to it is absurd but worshipping > > it is deeply weird. I always used to wonder what the unified > > field charts were trying to say, it was clear that they > > had an intention beyond simply informing the observer > > what the TMO thought was going on. > > > > But of course, if you buy the mystical idea of consciousness > > then the charts make sense, on their own terms. But until > > nature demonstrates that it's something other than blind chance, > > electromagnetism and entropy I'll be giving the charts a miss. > > > > > > > You don't necessarily find this assumption in main- > > > stream (read, not Fundamentalist and Supremicist) > > > Hinduism, or much of Buddhism, or even avant-garde > > > Christianity. The belief in God (or the "unified > > > field" or whatever you want to call it) as having > > > a Will and/or having a Plan for All Of This is > > > not a given at all. > > > > > > Many think as I do that if such a thing as a > > > fundamental, core level of existence as God or the > > > Absolute or <insert euphemism of your choice> exists, > > > it's just so NOT That Kinda Guy. > > > > > > It has been described by the great mystics and spir- > > > itual leaders of the planet as "devoid of attributes," > > > and as Just Fuckin' Not Involved in this universe. I > > > can groove with that. It strikes an intuitive reson- > > > ance with me. I think of God/the Absolute/whatever > > > as a kind of Operating System. It just exists; it > > > doesn't plan ahead or have desires for how All Of > > > This "should" turn out. > > > > > > I just roll my eyes and tune out the moment someone > > > I'm talking with or chatting with online starts refer- > > > ring to "God's will," or something similar. I find > > > the whole concept offensive and demeaning. WHO, after > > > all, could conceive of a sentient cosmic uber-being > > > so powerful as to have created All Of This and at > > > the same time so petty as to feel that it had to > > > micromanage it? That's just insulting. > > > > > >
