It seems like the people most interested in curing these npd and 
socio/psycho-paths are those who feel threatened by their behavior. I am not 
referring to anyone here, necessarily, but probably the best way to cure those 
people, is by responding appropriately to them. 

Intuition is a huge help in recognizing people like that - if it doesn't smell 
right, it isn't right. Once they see it doesn't work, they may possibly seek 
treatment. As long as their schtick works, though, no problem-o, from their 
perspective.

Seems like a bonafide first world problem - not something anyone just a smidge, 
or two, closer to natural processes, would encounter, or even think about, 
overruled by the growling of their stomach, to catch, or harvest a meal. 
However, makes for great mental fodder, while cruising the aisles of Safeway. 

--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> Xeno, sorry for attributing to you the idea of NPD's incurability. I took it 
> as tacit agreement when you left in that strong statement at the beginning of 
> the article. I was wrong to do so. Just to repeat that I'm very encouraged by 
> the work Dr. Behary is doing in the field of NPD. I think both she and Dr. 
> Siegel, whose focus is on other disorders, use mindfulness meditation. I 
> think they both also have a strong neurophysiological perspective on all this 
> which I think is very good news. Think undeveloped mirror neurons, which I 
> would guess sociopaths have, and what can be done to awaken and strengthen 
> them via mental techniques and everyday strategies.    
> 
> 
> As for so called normal people and spiritual practices and results, I'm now 
> mentally comparing Eckhart Tolle, Byron Katie and Adyashanti, three seemingly 
> very different paths to a quite realized, IMO, state in each case. I'll also 
> add in Father Keating whom Rick has interviewed. Actually listening to some 
> of those interviews might shed some light on what, if any, influence there is 
> from the original motivation onto the results.
> 
> From my own experience and reading about others and listening to others, I 
> think the whole thing is a crap shoot. I'm just reading Adya's Falling Into 
> Grace, which is of course, a much better way of saying that!
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius <anartaxius@...>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 8:32 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A short history of the FFL Posting Limits, for 
> Seraphita
>  
> 
> 
>   
> --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Xeno! You had me chuckling last night when I read this, thank you, and 
> > smiling this morning as I reply. And even Ravi has finally noticed how 
> > humorous you can be. See how much good a short, snappy reply can 
> > accomplish?! I'm just sayin...AND I really enjoy your longer replies too.
> > 
> > PS Any change in your opinion about NPD not being curable?
> 
> As the subject of NPD was brought up on FFL, I was just curious, just as when 
> I came across an article on sociopathy; so have been reading something about 
> them. The opinion that NPD is not curable is not mine, it is found in the 
> material I have read and copied to FFL. It is also the opinion in these 
> articles that sociopathy is not curable either; these things seem to be 
> baseline ways the brain and its programming interprets the world and the 
> sense of self. 
> 
> The question that interests me is can a discipline like meditation have a 
> significant impact on these people, and what would that impact be? It seems 
> to be an unconscious rule in spiritual circles, if you do so-and-so, there 
> will be some sort of uniform result. Maybe that is not true. Maybe only 
> certain people, or even just a subset of certain people (what sociopaths call 
> 'neuro-typical' people or empaths), respond in the predicted way to spiritual 
> techniques.
> 
> As research on meditation techniques is in general not very good, finding 
> data on population subsets like this would seem to be out of the question at 
> this point in most cases.
> 
> Mental problems aside, it would be interesting to find out if there is a 
> difference in result between people who learn meditation because they want to 
> feel better, and people who have strong desire for enlightenment, this latter 
> being the historical reason for doing meditation. This does not require a 
> scientific definition of enlightenment, since none exists in my acquaintance, 
> only that certain people want whatever the word enlightenment means to them.
> 
> "Normal people get too bothered witnessing suffering to keep seeing it. 
> Narcissists don't care â€" they are too focused on their own story, judging 
> the losers in a way that makes them feel good about themselves, etc. But 
> sociopaths can really see the suffering and keep going."
>


Reply via email to