--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "RoryGoff" wrote:
> (snip)
> > > > That deep-down Reality actually did give a shit, was big
> > > > enough to care about the tiny insignificant stuff like an
> > > > ego too.
> > >
> > TB: How do I interpret this statement other than, "My ego is
> > > SO cool that even the Creator must pay attention to it?" :-)
> >
> > HA! You are welcome to interpret it in any way you like!
> > "Egregious ego" works for me, and you and Judy will oddly
> > even be in agreement for once! :-)
>
> I would say that about the above, however, only if you
> were suggesting that Reality paid selective attention
> to only *certain* egos (yours being one), rather than
> to every last ego. And unlike Barry, I doubt that's
> what you had in mind.
>
AhA! Good point, Judy. No, I did not have that in mind. It appears to me
perhaps as if Reality pays complete attention to every ego, and does its level
best to fulfill both the unconscious and conscious desires thereof, but not
every ego pays complete attention to Reality. Perhaps only when this ego got
egregious enough, was it ready to listen to Reality, and be willing to accept
the idea that Reality might also listen to it :-)
