--- In [email protected], iranitea <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > Again, iranitea, you have the *wrong post* in mind. > > So you declare - wrongly.
No, dear, I'm correcting *you*. You are way, way off track, into the wild blue yonder. > As we are talking of Robins reaction on the 27 Dec, *I* was talking of his courteous reply to your challenge to his integrity that he made on December 19, and your positive response on December 20. He made that courteous response *even though he knew you were prejudiced against him* because of your hostile (yes, it was hostile) post to him of December 16. And he *saw through* your seemingly friendly response on December 20, as you went on to demonstrate in your exchange with Barry a few days later when you started talking about his mental health. Not a thing "mysterious" about it. Robin to Judy, December 19, 2011 (#299118): "I am grateful to you for having understood me so well in my ambivalent attitude towards Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. It is a real consolation to know that someone at least on FFL has grasped the contradiction of my experience of MMY as accurately as you have. This means a lot to me. "So that, when I came to this part of your post, I rejoiced in the fact that there was a human being who followed everything I have written about Maharishi and was therefore able to explain to zarzari_786 the paradox which had so perturbed and discomfited him. The paradox which, evidently, he felt constituted proof of my insincerity." > when I had written already my post on 26 December, the one > with the borderline that made you all upset. What's the > necessity of bringing in some posts of December 20? Where > is his act of 'seeing through me', when he needed to wait > until December 27, when things were clear? Judy, you are > getting old, you don't make sense at all. Yeah, I'm not the one making all the mistakes, iranitea. How old are you, by the way?
