--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, iranitea <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Yeah, sure, live on in your fantasy. Of course you remember > what Robin wrote to you, but he didn't 'see through me' in > the post on the 27th obviously, as I was explicit about it > on the 26. But you said he 'saw through me' in his answer, > did you? Where you referring to something there? Everything > else now is just your usual misdirection.
*From your very first post to him* (the one he didn't respond to) he knew you were prejudiced against him. I honestly don't know what you've got mixed up this time. It seems like your mental tangles just get worse and worse. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, iranitea <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Again, iranitea, you have the *wrong post* in mind. > > > > > > So you declare - wrongly. > > > > No, dear, I'm correcting *you*. You are way, way off track, > > into the wild blue yonder. > > > > > As we are talking of Robins reaction on the 27 Dec, > > > > *I* was talking of his courteous reply to your challenge > > to his integrity that he made on December 19, and your > > positive response on December 20. He made that courteous > > response *even though he knew you were prejudiced against > > him* because of your hostile (yes, it was hostile) post > > to him of December 16. And he *saw through* your seemingly > > friendly response on December 20, as you went on to > > demonstrate in your exchange with Barry a few days later > > when you started talking about his mental health. Not a > > thing "mysterious" about it. > > > > Robin to Judy, December 19, 2011 (#299118): > > > > "I am grateful to you for having understood me so well in my > > ambivalent attitude towards Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. It is a > > real consolation to know that someone at least on FFL has > > grasped the contradiction of my experience of MMY as > > accurately as you have. This means a lot to me. > > > > "So that, when I came to this part of your post, I rejoiced > > in the fact that there was a human being who followed > > everything I have written about Maharishi and was therefore > > able to explain to zarzari_786 the paradox which had so > > perturbed and discomfited him. The paradox which, evidently, > > he felt constituted proof of my insincerity." > > > > > when I had written already my post on 26 December, the one > > > with the borderline that made you all upset. What's the > > > necessity of bringing in some posts of December 20? Where > > > is his act of 'seeing through me', when he needed to wait > > > until December 27, when things were clear? Judy, you are > > > getting old, you don't make sense at all. > > > > Yeah, I'm not the one making all the mistakes, iranitea. > > How old are you, by the way? > > >
