--- In [email protected], iranitea <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], iranitea <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Again, iranitea, you have the *wrong post* in mind. > > > > > > So you declare - wrongly. > > > > No, dear, I'm correcting *you*. You are way, way off track, > > into the wild blue yonder. > > > > > As we are talking of Robins reaction on the 27 Dec, > > > > *I* was talking of his courteous reply to your challenge > > to his integrity that he made on December 19, and your > > positive response on December 20. He made that courteous > > response *even though he knew you were prejudiced against > > him* because of your hostile (yes, it was hostile) post > > to him of December 16. And he *saw through* your seemingly > > friendly response on December 20, as you went on to > > demonstrate in your exchange with Barry a few days later > > when you started talking about his mental health. Not a > > thing "mysterious" about it. > > > > Robin to Judy, December 19, 2011 (#299118): > > > > "I am grateful to you for having understood me so well in my > > ambivalent attitude towards Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. It is a > > real consolation to know that someone at least on FFL has > > grasped the contradiction of my experience of MMY as > > accurately as you have. This means a lot to me. > > > > "So that, when I came to this part of your post, I rejoiced > > in the fact that there was a human being who followed > > everything I have written about Maharishi and was therefore > > able to explain to zarzari_786 the paradox which had so > > perturbed and discomfited him. The paradox which, evidently, > > he felt constituted proof of my insincerity." > > So what? There is no seeing through either. My post on the 16 is what he was > referring to, and he obviously felt concerned about - big deal. It's simply a > defense to something I had raised. My later respectful, and grateful post of > the 20th did explicitly not take any of that back, as you seem to indicate. > If you have any doubts, read it again. Judy, I really can't know what is > going on in your head.
So let me get this straight Judy, just to pierce your fantasy: I make a critical post on 16 December 2011 (which you call hostile), Robin refers to this critics in an answer to you on the 19th, in one of his typical autobiographic posts, for which I show respect for his effort and his ability to narrate. Now, where exactly did he 'look through me' here?? In his answer on the 27th, when he already read my letter to Barry a day before (the one that upset you?). The post on the 19th was obviously the post I responded to a day later in a positive way, so he couldn't yet be impressed by my show of positivity? He only know my 'hostile' (your words) post of the 16th. So were is his grand vision of my personality? > > > when I had written already my post on 26 December, the one > > > with the borderline that made you all upset. What's the > > > necessity of bringing in some posts of December 20? Where > > > is his act of 'seeing through me', when he needed to wait > > > until December 27, when things were clear? Judy, you are > > > getting old, you don't make sense at all. > > > > Yeah, I'm not the one making all the mistakes, iranitea. > > How old are you, by the way? > > >
