--- In [email protected], "authfriend" wrote: > <snip> > > > He was nothing but courteous to > > > you even in his response to your hostile challenge to his > > > integrity. > > > > Well, it was up to him. He could have been more successful, > > if you weren't so outraged. > > (snicker) That response was written well before I became > so outraged. And you replied to it very positively, > apparently deciding to hide your real feelings about him. > He saw right through you, though, and told you so in that > post (the one with the mistaken attributions). >
Just to burst the bubble a bit, for your minions, who never check the timeline THEMSELVES, as they are too lazy, and just BELIEVE you: You got the timeline all wrong. The response of (the one with the many mistaken attributions) is post http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299889 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299889> by Robin, written on Dec. 27. My post to Barry, the one where I basically said what I thought, were I mentioned borderline, and which started with an agreement to Barry, which made you all upset, was this one http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299819 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/299819> on Dec. 26. His answer was about 20 hours later, only he responded to another still earlier post of mine, that may have confused you. There is therefore nothing mysterious in him knowing what I thought, he didn't see right through me earlier, this post is actually a result of his disappointment, oh yes he would declare that he saw through me, and thought I was prejudiced, whereas the reason I thought he was crazy, was at the start of the very same thread. Here you complain, me hiding my 'real feelings' (wrong: not feelings about him, but rather my opinion about the nature of his enlightenment), while earlier you complain about my insensitivity of revealing my opinion. One time you will complain, that I did it in his presence, because one doesn't say this in somebodies presence, and one time you complain, that I say it in his absence, because he is not here to defend himself. The person who felt I was vague and not truthful, and sort of contributed to be right upfront, was in no way Robin himself, as you may have concluded, but it was Steve (seventhray). So all your intuition, and his seeing thru me - its all rubbish. The one who saw through me was Steven. All the myth about your intellectual superiority, your always knowing the right timeline - its an urban myth. People never check it, because they are actually tired of dwelling in the past, and are lazy, and all too eager to follow you, and believe in whatever you say.
