Feste suppurated:
<< Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed
with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You
attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the
case. It is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in
the past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie
has to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. >>
And you're lying now. You saw the quote of your post I put up; you even
complimented yourself on it. So there's no issue of "misremembering," no
matter how leaky your memory may be getting, nor any issue of having to "follow
links," since I saved you the trouble of clicking.
Nor is there, in fact, any issue about whether Robin and I were serious in our
denunciations of each other in that exchange. We were playing games, as you
obviously knew when you wrote the post I quoted, and as everyone else knew when
they read our posts. (Oh, except Steve, who had to have the situation explained
to him in very simple terms before he understood.)
<< Opinions expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either.
Your hatred distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false
accusations. >>
Mmm. Except that you claimed you didn't know, not that you had a different
opinion back then.
Feste, you can't dig yourself out of this except by distorting the facts. I
predicted you didn't have the integrity to back me up in refuting Richard's
lie, and I was right.
<< There is no need to respond with links that "prove" what you are saying,
because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the archives to check on
something I may have said a long time ago. >>
Again: No need. I reproduced the post in question for you, and you read it and
found it good. But then, rather than acknowledge what you knew at the time, you
pretended it was all a big mystery to you.
The very *content* of that exchange with Robin made it obvious that it was all
in fun, just as the content of your post made it obvious that you were well
aware of that. You weren't that clueless then, and you aren't that clueless now.
<< Who cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who
has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars. >>
You have it backwards. It's their lying that leads me not to like them. You
and I had been on pretty good terms until you decided you were going to make
points with Share by attacking me, and began to use dishonesty as a weapon.
I must say it's quite a stretch to characterize someone's opposition to
dishonesty as "malicious" and "a very ugly trait." I suggest that says a lot
more about you than it does about me.
<< Of course you are unable to see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why
do so many people on this forum despise you? >>
I already told you why: people with integrity are never popular with those who
lack it. Why are you asking again?
<< Why are you always involved in arguments here in which everyone is a liar
except you? >>
Well, I'm not, actually. Most people here are honest, and we have arguments
that don't involve issues of dishonesty. (Ann, DoctorDumbass, Seraphita, John,
Mike, Michael, Paligap, even poor Steve come immediately to mind.) Not even all
my arguments with liars are about their dishonesty.
Or to answer another way, "except you" is because (duh) I don't lie.
<< The best thing you could do now would be to apologize for your insulting
language toward me, but that would require a level of decency on your part that
you have never before shown. >>
You first. If your apology is sincere, I'll likely accept it. Then we'll see
what else needs to be said. I'm not holding my breath, however.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <authfriend@...> wrote:
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The "jackass" part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <authfriend@...> wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
<< Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go
figure. >>
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
<< Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face
reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing.
Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are
the only one with integrity.
"In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and
the characters I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about
even myself..."
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 >>
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted
from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib?
Poor fellow.
