that's cool, Michael. One of the informants here went in and out of dimensions 
while simply walking through the city in which he lives. 

 We were all so envious, wishing we could be special like that.
 

 The rest of us, sigh, can only take simple, uneventful walks, sigh.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :

 

 There is no evidence for there being any multiverses 

 

 That's not true - there are any number of channels and New Age-y types who 
claim there are multiple dimensions all over the place.

 

 From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 3:18 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: When Worlds Collide....
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote :

 Re "The multiverse is a theory . . . I don't see why atheists would use this 
theory to support their idea that there is no God.":
 

 

 There is no evidence for there being any multiverses - it is as much a leap of 
faith as believing in God. The "God option" really means you have trust in 
whatever is unfolding.
 

 There might be soon. David Deutsch, who runs the quantum computing lab at 
Oxford, makes the case that multiverse theories are the simplest way of 
explaining quantum theory. Most other physicists disagree due to lack of 
evidence but he intends to prove it using a virtual reality program of an atom 
running on a quantum computer. 
 

 I don't fully get what he's going on about but apparently there is a way that 
quantum computers can reveal how they work while they are doing computations 
about themselves (!), this will tell us a lot about what sort of universe we 
live in. All we need is a computer we don't have yet that exploits Qbits, the 
ability of things in the quantum world to be in potentially two, or more, 
places at once. But they are on the way. I get the impression that if he pulls 
it off he'll be the most famous scientist since Einstein but it's a long way 
away. But quantum computing is the future whatever it tells us.
 

 But as I said in another post, this in't the multiverse you are talking about 
but they might be provable - should they exist. Maybe cosmologists should just 
start again. Wouldn't be the first time...



 


 










  • [FairfieldLife]... anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
  • [FairfieldLife]... jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
    • [Fairfield... s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... salyavin808
        • Re... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
        • [F... salyavin808
        • [F... lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
        • [F... s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
  • [FairfieldLife]... salyavin808

Reply via email to