--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
> I agree that the best way to settle the middle east would have been 
to
> get off of oil entirely, but that's not what has happened. Many 
things
> in the relative involve choosing the lesser evil, that's why it's
> relative. 

I don't get what you're saying. If you are implying that the option to 
get off oil was there, and ignored, and war chosen instead, how is war 
the 'lesser evil'? 

The leadership of the USA consciously chose to kill vs to solve the 
problem. Since killing involves sin, whether you agree with it or not, 
it requires a strong karmic return. 

In other words, even if war is seen as a justifiable option, 
unfortunately the laws of cause and effect can't be bypassed. The 
violence will only be perpetuated. This is why it is such a sin to do 
this. This is the evil. Not only the act itself, but the miserable 
cycle of karma that it begets.

It's not about bullying either, we could do a far better job
> at that if that was the goal. 
> 
> JohnY
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to