> Hi, I appreciate your comments and questions, but I find myself
> unable to respond to each of them, just as an artist would find it
> difficult to justify or explain each brushstroke, or a poet each
> line of a poem.
>
> What I expressed was the exposition of a single thought and feeling,
> in a very specific context. The singularity expressed transcends its
> elements.
>
> I have read through my posting here, and wouldn't make any changes
> to it. So I am left with the impression that you question or
> disagree with some of it.
>
> I am not copping out, or finding your comments not worth a response,
> so please don't misunderstand me. I just don't know what else to say
> to you to clarify or justify further what I have written.
>
I am not arguing, or necessariliy disagreeing with most of what you
said, but rather raising some additional points. Its true, two
different people can arrive at two different interpretations of the
same event -- in this case, a satsang.
My broader point is that, as above, experiences also have multiple
possible valid interpretations. What I find odd -- not referring to
you post specifically -- in some discusssions some posters react quite
negatively to suggestions that alterntive interpretations of
experiences might be valid -- or at least of use to explore. (Just as
multiple interpreations are possible as to what happens in satsangs
generally. In which case, across many satsangs, I would expect both
models sometimes fit.)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
