--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> <shempmcgurk@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@>
> wrote:
> <snip>
> > > > > Wasn't that a heavy duty unstressing thing?
> > > >
> > > > No, apparently it was an unwanted pass at an underling
> > > > employee.  It's called sexual harrassment.
> > >
> > > Not mutually exclusive, of course.  O-J said it was
> > > unstressing.  He also said unstressing was no excuse.
> >
> > It probably is an excuse, a phony one, if you are not in heavy long
> > term rounding.
>
> Maybe I didn't make myself clear, or maybe you
> didn't read what he wrote.  He said it was *not*
> an excuse, i.e., he was not excusing the bad
> behavior on the grounds that he was unstressing.
>
> There's a difference between an excuse and an
> explanation.  If you want to claim it was a phony
> explanation, fine.  But phony or not, he was not
> using the explanation as an excuse.


OK. Point taken. I revise my statement. I think it was a phony
explanation.

Again, was his neck snapping violently from side to side
when he hit on her? (That image STILL cracks me up.)

And again, in my observations, gross and obnoxious hitting on women on
courses -- or in centers, was a CHRONIC behavioir of those so
inclined. It was not a one time event for all I saw.

>From a different, but related angle, is DOJ making the case that after
being exposed to many gorgeous, vivacious movement women over 25
years, and watching Domash and others score wildly for years, he
finally, after 25 years decided to make his first, only and last
inappropriate pass?

Doesn't pass the smell test. Doesn't fit the hitter "profile" in my
observations.

Nor the grapevine. I had heard stories about DOJ hitting on woman
before. Maybe false rumor -- who knows -- but where there is smoke,
probabilisticaly speaking there is usually fire.

It ties to his statement about trying and evaluating most meditation
methods. Just doesn't ring true to me -- having seen and heard him a
lot in the 70's aropund MIU.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Religion and spirituality Maharishi mahesh yogi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to