On Jun 26, 2006, at 10:42 PM, authfriend wrote:

--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:15 PM, authfriend wrote:


--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:



On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:40 PM, authfriend wrote:


--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:


By request.


Ken Wilber demonstrates different brainwave patterns on a

standard

home unit used in Neuro-feedback.


Ever hear of a TMer doing a blank wave?


No, I'm sure you haven't...


You've posted this here before, as I recall, Vaj.


Yes, that's right Judy. Thanks for noticing. :-)



Explain to us again (a) why we should be impressed

that Wilber can do a "blank wave" on a home EEG

unit;


Because of the *style* of samadhi this is indicative of (to put

it in TM lingo) is that of Unity Consciousness.


And we know that a "blank wave" on a home EEG unit is

indicative of a Unity Consciousness style of samadhi

because...?


Apparently someone needs to do some research!


Well, do it then, for goodness' sake!


I'm quite happy (TM trans.:blissful) with what I've found thank you!


However it should also be noted this relates to a different path

than -> PC -> CC -> eventually leads to UC.


It sure is.


Is it?


Of course.


Uh huh.


 Instead it should be seen as UC

grasped as the path (unusual because you are taking UC *as the

path*,

rather than as an *end state*) and maturing into BC (to use the

TM metaphor).


and (b) why we should be disheartened (or

gleeful, if we're TM critics) that we've never heard

of a TMer doing a "blank wave"?


Because we should realize and make the connection that *dualistic

methods lead to dualistic states of consciousness* (e.g. the

witnessing artifact, which is an artifact of a dualistic

meditation method).


But which (as you know, and just said above) is a

transitional feature in terms of UC.


I assume you are referring to GC?


GC??


GC = "God Consciousness" (i.e. the style of realization typical of Vaishnava bhakti bliss kittens). If you visited an airport in the 70's or early 80's you might get it....


I'm sorry I don't buy the GC fallacy Mahesh has fed you.


Either would Shankara...


I think you've lost the thread here, Vaj.  Why don't

you just go and do your research and then come back

and tell us what you've found out?


We still need to know, however, why a "blank wave" on a

home EEG machine should be assumed to represent a nondual

state of consciousness (and presumably why "nonblank waves"

on a home EEG machine should be assumed to represent a

dualistic state of consciousness).


Like I said, if you do not understand *why*, it sounds like you 

need to do some more hunting--or some more exploration in terms of 

the *spectrum* of meditative practices...


No, no, that would be *you* who needs to do the

research so you know what the hell you're talking

about and can explain to us the answers to the

questions I asked.


I can't do it for you Judy.


Oh, sure you can, Vaj.  You know how to use Google.


 That's not in any way to imply that dualistic states of

meditation are *bad* or *lesser* than other forms of meditation.

Instead they should be understood as a continuum naturally

occurring

in meditative praxis. However, it should not be missed that *one

is

much faster than the other!*



Well, here it is:


http://www.tinyurl.com/cmay6


(bottom of the page)


Eventually we'll see similar technology used to qualify and

verify those claiming certain states (e.g. someone claiming 

access to a non-dual state should be able to make a "flat" 

EEG).


Oh, and while you're at it, (c) why making a "flat" EEG

(on a home machine) should be considered a requirement

for those claiming access to a nondual state?


It's not a *requirement*, merely one possible, measurable

signature...that's all.


OK, that's not what you said, however.  I guess you

just miswrote.


LOL. No, it just a refinement of what I previously hinted at. You  

missed it.


No, no.  Look at what you wrote that I was commenting on.

You just got your syntax a bit tangled up, as you so

often do.


If you don't "get this", that's fine. It's probably just an 

artifact of your paradigm.


What paradigm would that be, Vaj, the English language?


 Not unusual for people who are indoctrinated in  

*any* school of thought (or belief).


LOL!!


Do I detect a hint of bliss?


That's why yogis who practice the path of Unity Consciousness  

emphatically say "don't get caught in a "school"".


I bet they also don't have any trouble answering

questions, either.


Of course not, in a language foreign to most...not merely the Van Gogh's with *one* ear...


__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





SPONSORED LINKS
Religion and spirituality Buddha shakyamuni Maharishi mahesh yogi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to