--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > It looks like the same chart from different reproduction accuracies > > to me. > > Oh, please. You're bound and determined they're > going to be the same chart, no matter what, even > if you have to deny what your eyes are seeing. > > Both seem to show maximum coherence during flying for about 10 > > minutes. > > Yes, as I said: The overall pattern is similar. It's > the details that are different.
Given so much discussion on the apparent, to some, significant differences in the charts,may I ask, Judy: what is the significance of the differences you feel are substantial? How does it change the debate of cohenrence prior to or after lift off etc? (To preempt a possible point of confusion, no, you did not say the above, that it changes the debate of cohenrence prior to or afer lift off etc. But if there is no significance to the larger debate, what is you point in repeated stating there is asignificant difference. For example, I see one small area of difference. But it is totally insignifcant relative to the larger debate. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
