--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning > > <no_reply@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > > <jstein@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > Just for the record, since about 1984, the TMO has > > > > > > > > been quite clear that actual flying has not yet been > > > > > > > > achieved, and that all practitioners are doing is > > > > > > > > hopping. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, but 1977-1983 were some crazy, mixed-up, wild-ass > > > > years. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > ...add dishonesty to the mix. > > > > > > > > > > > > Publishing photos of flyers in the uppermost apex of the > > > > > > hopping parabola is, intentially, deceitful and that's > > > > > > exactly what the TMO did. There's 100+ possible points in > > > > > > the hopping parabola...gee, why pick the one at the apex to > > > > > > publicize? > > > > > > > > > > Uh, Shemp, you need to give this one just a > > > > > *teeeeeensy* bit more thought. > > > > > > > > > Enlighten me, Judy, why it was NOT dishonest publicizing > > > > photographs of flyers in the apex of the hopping parabola... > > > > > > Think it through, Shemp. Start by explaining the > > > "deception" involved: > > > > > > 1. What would someone assume *incorrectly* if they saw > > > a photo taken at the apex of the parabola rather than > > > at a lower point? > > > > Gee, I dunno, Judy, that the person was LEVITATING and FLOATING in > > the air maybe????? > > BZZZZT. Why would they NOT think that if the photo > were taken at a lower point of the parabola? > > Try again, please. > > > > 2. What would their *correct* assumption be if the hop > > > were shown at a lower point? > > > > Think it through, Judy, and ask yourself who should be doing the > > assuming: > > Non sequitur. > > > those promoting and distributing photos of alleged > > levitation....or...those reading their papers over their morning > > coffee. > > > > Do you think that the TMO acted morally and honestly back in > > the '70s when they released those photos? > > I'll address that once you've addressed the "point > on the parabola" issue. >
Every time you can't answer a question or you are befuddled, you always do the same thing: you say "I'll answer that once you've addressed my question". do me a favor: ignore my posts and don't comment on them anymore, please. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
