--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning 
> > <no_reply@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> > <jstein@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > Just for the record, since about 1984, the TMO has
> > > > > > > > been quite clear that actual flying has not yet been
> > > > > > > > achieved, and that all practitioners are doing is
> > > > > > > > hopping.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Yes, but 1977-1983 were some crazy, mixed-up, wild-ass 
> > > > years. :)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ...add dishonesty to the mix.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Publishing photos of flyers in the uppermost apex of the
> > > > > > hopping parabola is, intentially, deceitful and that's 
> > > > > > exactly what the TMO did.  There's 100+ possible points 
in 
> > > > > > the hopping parabola...gee, why pick the one at the apex 
to 
> > > > > > publicize?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Uh, Shemp, you need to give this one just a
> > > > > *teeeeeensy* bit more thought.
> > > > >
> > > > Enlighten me, Judy, why it was NOT dishonest publicizing 
> > > > photographs of flyers in the apex of the hopping parabola...
> > > 
> > > Think it through, Shemp.  Start by explaining the
> > > "deception" involved:
> > > 
> > > 1. What would someone assume *incorrectly* if they saw
> > > a photo taken at the apex of the parabola rather than
> > > at a lower point?
> > 
> > Gee, I dunno, Judy, that the person was LEVITATING and FLOATING 
in 
> > the air maybe?????
> 
> BZZZZT.  Why would they NOT think that if the photo
> were taken at a lower point of the parabola?
> 
> Try again, please.
> 
> > > 2. What would their *correct* assumption be if the hop
> > > were shown at a lower point?
> > 
> > Think it through, Judy, and ask yourself who should be doing the 
> > assuming:
> 
> Non sequitur.
> 
> > those promoting and distributing photos of alleged 
> > levitation....or...those reading their papers over their morning 
> > coffee.
> > 
> > Do you think that the TMO acted morally and honestly back in 
> > the '70s when they released those photos?
> 
> I'll address that once you've addressed the "point
> on the parabola" issue.
>


Every time you can't answer a question or you are befuddled, you 
always do the same thing: you say "I'll answer that once you've 
addressed my question".

do me a favor: ignore my posts and don't comment on them anymore, 
please.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to