--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > Fortunately, such people are in the minority > > > here, as they seem to be in the US. A country > > > closes its doors to new blood at its own peril. > > > > Of course the US is highly pro immigaration and has been through most > > of its history. This is distinct form some European countries that are > > considering much tighter restrictions in legal immigation -- that is > > its quotas adn requirements. The US's primary issue is on undocumented > > aka "illigal' immigration -- and its implictions for national > > security, not on immigration itself. > > You haven't talked to many people trying to immigrate > to the United States in the last few years, have you? > They've got jobs waiting for them there, a US company > that's providing lawyers to get them accepted so they > can go to work, and they get rejected. > > And these stories are being told by people who have > lived with the *French* bureaucracy, which is the > worst on any known planet in the universe. > Well, I didn't say US legal immigration policy was optimal. I am for less restrictive immigration globally. But US immigration I believe outstirps most coutries.
And my primary point remains: The US's immigration focus is on stemming undocumented immigration. Other countries appear more focussed on retrictions of legal immigration. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
