--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > There's no right way or wrong way to look at it. I just think > > that > > > > its time to declare these states of conciousness as attainable > > and > > > > normal, since there are more and more people being established > > in > > > > them. All the prior stuff I've written still holds too. > > > > > > Thats fine as your opinion, your recollection from your SCI course > > or > > > something. > > > > > > however, if you are making a definitive statement of such, then > > > perhaps you can answer the query that you missed or ignored in the > > > post you are replying to: > > > > > > And this is your personal experience in living in stabilized BC? > > > > > > Is this MMY's BC? His criteria and attributes? Or another's? > > > > > You tell me, please. > > From what you have said, and from (my) being a TM teacher, it appears > you are referring to a BC that someone else, or you, defined for you. > Its not MMY's TMO BC. Again, that does not imply better or worse. > But different. > > But if you doubt me, go to the domes and discuss your experience with > M. Or ask your proxies (those who "know you are in BC because they are > in BC"*) who are in FF go to the Domes and expound these experiences > to MMY. See if he proclaims it BC per his VIEW. I defer to his > assessemnt on what is and what is not TMO/MMY BC. > > Some of your proxies are actually in the Domes, aren't they? > > Regardeless, it is beyond me why the FF SS BCers are so shy about > going to the Dome mic and expounding on their clear sidhis and > stabilized BC. > > >You know the answer as well as I do. I won't > > answer this for you. You will have to, even if you are 'wrong'. :-) > > However, the fact that you continue to avoid answer and divert with > empty neo-advaita speak, well, it pretty much says it all. > > > *Or is it the otherway around. Regardless, sounds like a possible > tautology. "I am in BC because you who are in BC says so. And you are > in BC because i am who is in BC says so." >
To paraphrase Valentine Michael Smith: Truely, Thou Art in BC --but then again, who isn't? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
