sparaig wrote:

>--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>hermandan0 wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>trying to follow new.mornings posting inspirations, i've started a new
>>>thread instead of intjecting this into the old one :)
>>>
>>>--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>--- In [email protected], "vajradhatu108" 
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>><snip> 
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>Any meditation technique that relies on a object
>>>>>of meditation, a mantra, the breath, etc. will by
>>>>>it's very nature have some subtle effort (as Mahesh
>>>>>acknowledged at Estes Park in regard to TM).* 
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>Of course, it's never been established that what he
>>>>said at Estes Park ever "acknowledged" any such
>>>>thing.
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I'm not sure exactly what the Estes Park quote is, but Maharishi was
>>>quite clear that there is some "doing" in the thinking/picking up of
>>>the mantra and that, yes, this is a contradictory to the mantra just
>>>appearing on its own. That's why the the instruction to think or pick
>>>up the mantra is qualified by saying "effortlessy" or "as effortessly
>>>as a thought comes". Of course one is thinking and of course thinking
>>>is doing. It may be an effortless doing, but it's a doing.
>>>
>>>While it may not be fair to dismiss TM as being a technique of
>>>"effort" on account of that, vaj is, IMO, not incorrect in calling it
>>>"subtle effort" becaue of that doing. To misunderstand this puts one
>>>in the position of a meditator I once encountered who asked "What
>>>happens if you sit there for the entire 20 minutes and the mantra
>>>doesn't come?" Duh.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Nit-picking and over analyzing the method does not help anything 
>>either.  When you sit to meditate you just introduce or think the 
>>mantra.  What was trying to be avoided was forcing the mind on the 
>>mantra or any straining.  That is the context of the checking notes.  
>>This is also the teaching in other traditions.
>>
>>A properly enlivened mantra will enchant the mind anyway but if 
>>something is stirred up by the process it will usually express itself as 
>>thoughts.
>>
>>Folks might want to read Sivananda's "Mind - It's Mysteries and Control"
>>http://www.dlshq.org/download/mind.htm
>>which was originally published in 1936, years before Maharishi ever 
>>dreamt of becoming a monk and discusses the process of meditation in 
>>very similar terms.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Well hmmm....
>
>"A Mantra purifies the mind. Mere repetition of a Mantra, parrot-like, has 
>very little effect. 
>It has some benefit. It must be repeated with Bhava (feeling). Then it 
>produces wonderful 
>effects. The Mantra, unless inspired with the powerful will-force of one's own 
>mind, 
>cannot produce much effect."
>
Be sure to read the "Some Useful Hints" section.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to