--- In [email protected], cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Jason Spock <jedi_spock@> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >       Well Sir barry, I think Jim is correct.
> >    
> >       The Hindu Philosophy states, Sidhis are by-products that come
> on its own.
> >    
> >       It also states,  they are distractions that should be avoided
> at all costs.
> >    
> 
> That's the same old tired misinterpretation of PataƱjali!
> Everyone should believe by now, that the demonstrative
> pronoun "te" in "te samaadhaav upasargaa..." apparently
> refers MAINLY to the siddhis mentioned in the previous suutra.
> Why would PataƱjali present e.g. tha flying suutra (aakaasha-gamanam)
> *after* that "disclaimer", if it applied to all the siddhis?
>


In my opinion, it DOES apply to all the siddhis. They are obstacles [to be 
overcome] to 
samadhi. A test of, or way of "proving" (in the original sense of the word), 
samadhi.

Reply via email to