--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > --- In [email protected], Peter
> > <drpetersutphen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Amen to that, brother. I actually transecend while
> > > doing the middle rhythm of SK. Its very funny
> > because
> > > the mind loses all content other than the
> > foundational
> > > intent it had right before it transcended/stopped
> > and
> > > when it becomes active again it has no idea why
> > the
> > > body is huffing and puffing for a few moments
> > before
> > > memory kicks in. SK is really quite amazing. A
> > yogic
> > > cognition by SSRS. 
> > >
> > 
> > Completely different than TM's transcendental
> > consciousness.
> 
> Sparaig, you have truly got to be kidding me. First of
> all this is my experience, not yours and second of all
> you don't even do SK. You are only speaking out of TB
> dogma, now aren't you? Transcendental consciousness
> can be reached by a near infinite number of procedures
> and techniques. It boggles the mind to think that you
> truly believe that MMY and the techniques of the TMO
> are the only valid and legitimate means of
> experiencing what one already "is."?

*You* have to be kidding, Peter, to suggest
Lawson said anything even remotely like that.

Good grief.  And the TM supporters here are
supposed to be the fuzzy thinkers.


Reply via email to