---Thanks, 1972, I was working at SIMS in L.A.; MMY's personal 
hairdresser also worked there.  Once, he spontaneously told me (in 
all seriousness), that he once walked past MMY's open door and inside 
he was copulating with a female.
 Although this is once removed as witness evidence, it ...along with 
other circumstantial evidence, would be accepted in a court of law.
Doesn't bother me in the least, however; but why evade the truth? 
It's kind of obvious, just don't turn a blind eye to such things...
(addressing those who mistakenly believe E'd people "must" have some 
type of standards that they've set up in their(the disbelievers) 
minds).  Non-sequitur. Besides, what difference does it make?

In [email protected], "geezerfreak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > On Feb 2, 2007, at 4:50 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > 
> > > > It's an ugly scenario all around, one that in my
> > > > considered opinion is best avoided altogether by
> > > > teachers keeping their dicks in their pants.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Or by simply practicing Spiritual Anarchy--what a buddy of mine 
> > (a  
> > > Zen Master) calls "Socially Responsible Anarchy". We'd never 
hear  
> > > Mahesh Varma telling his students to do that (or any of these 
> > other  
> > > hucksters).
> > > 
> > > Here's what my friend had to say on taking personal 
> > responsibility  
> > > when I asked him about it last summer:
> > > 
> > > (7 min MP3)
> > > 
> > > http://snipurl.com/1971a-QGCBVG
> > >
> > oooooh "Spiritual Anarchy" oooooh, sounds SO IMPORTANT!!! So 
> > very...what's the word? Oh right...EGO-centric...and, and 
> > your "buddy" is a "Zen Master"?? Gosh I am so, so impressed, I'm 
> > about to pee my pants!!!
> >
> Jim, Jim.....calm down pal. You appear to be experiencing some
> roughness of awareness over this discussion. If you think MMY is
> perfect and incapable of any wrong action, great! Better not to read
> posts with ideas that upset your world view.
>


Reply via email to