--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of TurquoiseB > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 2:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: What is Normal and Accepted? > > > > --- In [email protected] > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected] > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think in the style of abuse we're talking about here, > > > what distinguishes it as abnormal is a power disparity > > > between the two parties and less the age disparity-- > > > although age to certain extent plays into it if you > > > assume some naivete on the part of the younger "victim". > > > In that sense power disparity (or even *perceived* power > > > disparity) together with the naivete of youth could be > > > potent factor for an old "lecher's" success. > > It's not just about naïveté. Many of the women > I talked to are worldly to the max. They've been > around the block, romantically and sexually. They > were no naïve victims. And they all *knew* that > this was a path with disaster written all over > it, but they took that path anyway. > > Linda Williams Pearce was a virgin when she went to Rishikesh. She came away > from the experience very embittered. >
So she had sex with the guru but not the Beattles?
