--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > But there's nothing like the cross - and nobody posting here has > > > had the occasion to cross-examine the Maharishi to get his side > > > of the story, and that's a fact. Until someone does that, the > > > issue is moot, and therefore cannot be established. It's just > > > gossip, pure and simple. > > > > geezerfreak wrote: > > "Cross-examine MMY to get his side of the story." That's just > > hilarious. I'll get right on that. > > > Well, first of all, you obviously haven't even talked to a Maharishi > secretary in your whole life, much less the Maharishi himself. You > haven't presented any evidence at all - nothing to refute, except more > gossip.
Wrong on all counts Tex. I've had an ongoing dialog with a number of former skin boys and secretaries, including Tom from Canada by the way, and spent many years aound MMY in the 70s in Switz. Clearly this topic make you upset. Like I said to Sparaig, if you choose not to beleive any of this, fine. Don't. I just report what I've learned and the conclusions I've come to. I heard the rumors when I was around MMY in the 70s but, like you, chose to ignore them. It is only this past year, when I reconnected with many of the people I was with in Switz that the stories all came out and I realized there was far too much to ignore. Then later last year someone I actually know, someone you may know as well, told her story to a very few. She has nothing to gain and everything to lose and is still conflicted about "coming out". The reason she still keeps this quiet is because of people like you, who would clearly attempt to destroy her already fragile state in order to keep your fantasy intact.
