geezerfreak wrote: > "Cross-examine MMY to get his side of the story." That's just > hilarious. I'll get right on that. > Well, first of all, you obviously haven't even talked to a Maharishi secretary in your whole life, much less the Maharishi himself. You haven't presented any evidence at all - nothing to refute, except more gossip.
Sure he has. Geez knows a bunch of those guys. > Say, mind "Hello Tony? It's Geez. > if I jet over and ask M a few questions about the chicks ne nailed > back in the day?" > You've already failed the bar exam - it hasn't been established that he "nailed" any chicks. Remember, you haven't had the opportunity to cross examine Mahesh yet - all you've read is rumors on the internet. Even if it were possible to "cross-examine" him, which it isn't and never has been, how would that prove anything? He would deny it. There is no semen-stained dress here. No photos. As far as we know no offspring on whom DNA testing can be performed. All we have is the testimony of half a dozen women, most of whom aren't even willing to go public with their full names and stories, and half a dozen personal secretaries. Some of the women have expressed the intention to tell their stories after MMY dies. Judith Bourke is rumored to have written a book. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. If they do, maybe more women will come forward, maybe they won't. Not sure how much more can be said about this topic. You either believe it or not, or somewhere in between. "A man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest." - Simon and Garfunkel
