--- In [email protected], "geezerfreak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > But there's nothing like the cross - and nobody posting here has > > > > had the occasion to cross-examine the Maharishi to get his side > > > > of the story, and that's a fact. Until someone does that, the > > > > issue is moot, and therefore cannot be established. It's just > > > > gossip, pure and simple. > > > > > > geezerfreak wrote: > > > "Cross-examine MMY to get his side of the story." That's just > > > hilarious. I'll get right on that. > > > > > Well, first of all, you obviously haven't even talked to a Maharishi > > secretary in your whole life, much less the Maharishi himself. You > > haven't presented any evidence at all - nothing to refute, except more > > gossip. > > Wrong on all counts Tex. I've had an ongoing dialog with a number of > former skin boys and secretaries, including Tom from Canada by the > way, and spent many years aound MMY in the 70s in Switz. > > Clearly this topic make you upset. Like I said to Sparaig, if you > choose not to beleive any of this, fine. Don't. > > I just report what I've learned and the conclusions I've come to. I > heard the rumors when I was around MMY in the 70s but, like you, chose > to ignore them. > It is only this past year, when I reconnected with many of the people > I was with in Switz that the stories all came out and I realized there > was far too much to ignore. Then later last year someone I actually > know, someone you may know as well, told her story to a very few. She > has nothing to gain and everything to lose and is still conflicted > about "coming out". > > The reason she still keeps this quiet is because of people like you, > who would clearly attempt to destroy her already fragile state in > order to keep your fantasy intact. >
"Fragile state" sounds real reliable.
