--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" > > > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > sparaig wrote: > > > > > So, in the case of MMY's secretaries, you think they would > > > > > talk to the guy who "procurred" them for him? > > > > > > > > > The only secretary I've seen posting on the internet is Tom Anderson > > > > on Usenet, and although Tom had lots to say about the > > > > comings-and-goings of the Maharishi, including what appears on his > > > > passport, Tom never said anything about any sexual encounters. After > > > > dialoging with Tom for close to two years, he never even > > > > attempted to suggest that. Tom should know - apparently he was > in the > > > > same room with the Maharishi for about a year in Spain TTC and > > > > Switzerland TTC. And I'm sure that if Tom knew anything about > this he > > > > would have reported it, seeing as how he wasn't exactly a Mahesh > > > admirer! > > > > > > > > According to what I've read, the Maharishi wasn't even in Spain > > > > for most of the Majorrca TTC and when he was there, he was in a > > > > different hotel most of the time. Go figure. > > > > > > > > But there's nothing like the cross - and nobody posting here has had > > > > the occasion to cross-examine the Maharishi to get his side of the > > > > story, and that's a fact. Until someone does that, the issue is > moot, > > > > and therefore cannot be established. It's just gossip, pure and > simple. > > > > > > > "Cross-examine MMY to get his side of the story." That's just > > > hilarious. I'll get right on that. "Hello Tony? It's Geez. Say, mind > > > if I jet over and ask M a few questions about the chicks ne nailed > > > back in the day?" > > > > > > > The ones he nailed back when he wsa 50ish? > > > > > > Ceibate for 40 years before and for 40 years after, as far as I can > tell. > > > Good for you Sparaig. If you need to believe that to feel good then > believe it. >
Well, OK. So you're saying that MMY was sexually active when? When he was a kid? When he was in college? He forsook pre-marital sex so he could go stay in a monastary for 13 years with Gurudev? During the 2-3 years after Gurudev died when he holed up in a hut in Rishikesh? Perhaps he was hitting up young women during his stay at the Olsons 59-61ish? And then, according to Chopra and others, MMY had a major physical breakdown about 15-20 years ago, so are you saying that he was sexually active after that, after age 70? Just what time-frame are we talking about?
