--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > geezerfreak wrote: > > "Cross-examine MMY to get his side of the story." That's just > > hilarious. I'll get right on that. > > > Well, first of all, you obviously haven't even talked to a Maharishi > secretary in your whole life, much less the Maharishi himself. You > haven't presented any evidence at all - nothing to refute, except more > gossip. > > Sure he has. Geez knows a bunch of those guys. > > > Say, mind "Hello Tony? It's Geez. > > if I jet over and ask M a few questions about the chicks ne nailed > > back in the day?" > > > You've already failed the bar exam - it hasn't been established that > he "nailed" any chicks. Remember, you haven't had the opportunity to > cross examine Mahesh yet - all you've read is rumors on the internet. > > Even if it were possible to "cross-examine" him, which it isn't and never > has been, how would that prove anything? He would deny it. There is no > semen-stained dress here. No photos. As far as we know no offspring on whom > DNA testing can be performed. All we have is the testimony of half a dozen > women, most of whom aren't even willing to go public with their full names > and stories, and half a dozen personal secretaries. Some of the women have > expressed the intention to tell their stories after MMY dies. Judith Bourke > is rumored to have written a book. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. If > they do, maybe more women will come forward, maybe they won't. Not sure how > much more can be said about this topic. You either believe it or not, or > somewhere in between. > > "A man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest." - Simon and > Garfunkel >
How many personal secretaries has MMY gone through?
