> > . . . > > Actually, it just might be quite entertaining to see the guy talk > > himself out of that corner :-) > > I imagine there are various word games he can > play, but they'll look awfully cute beside his > accusations that *Lawson* was playing word games. > > > More important, however, is the fact that being and acting in > > the capacity of journalist, Andrew Skolnick is de facto bound > > by a set of minimum ethical requirements it is not in his > > interest that people think he has violated. > > If the trial record containing the incriminating > language can be tightly documented, perhaps it > and his relevant posts could be reproduced-- > without comment--on various journalism forums. > > I wonder if the National Association of Science > Writers has an appropriate public forum... > > > > http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?id=387 > > http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp > > > > I suppose the guy also can be sued
It's...what...eight years later now? And Andrew Skolnick, the non-meditator, has moved on and wisely doesn't even THINK about TM and TMers any more, especially about those few insane TMers who once obsessed on him and did everything they could to try to destroy him and his reputation because he wrote a few things they didn't like about Deepak Chopra in a medical journal. And the same amount of time later, those *same* pro- ponents of meditation, the thing that is supposed to free them from attachment and make their lives bliss, are *still* obsessing on Skolnick and rubbing their cyberhands together with glee as they plot how to destroy him and his reputation. The only thing that has changed for them in all these years is now they try equally hard to destroy Chopra and *his* reputation as well. Sure speaks volumes about the value of TM, eh?
