--- In [email protected], gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
> > * "Candy Baby" (1969) -- the best review of all, for
> > what
> > will be obvious reasons if you check out its IMDB
> > page at:
> > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0182866/  Similar
> 
> Click on MMY's name and the blurb about him begins
> with "Indian cult leader".

Oh, well, that settles it, then.

> 
> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0948343/
> 
> --- TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > --- In [email protected], Vaj
> > <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Feb 22, 2007, at 3:11 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > 
> > > > It's...what...eight years later now?
> > > >
> > > > And Andrew Skolnick, the non-meditator, has
> > moved
> > > > on and wisely doesn't even THINK about TM and
> > TMers
> > > > any more, especially about those few insane
> > TMers
> > > > who once obsessed on him and did everything they
> > > > could to try to destroy him and his reputation
> > > > because he wrote a few things they didn't like
> > > > about Deepak Chopra in a medical journal.
> > > >
> > > > And the same amount of time later, those *same*
> > pro-
> > > > ponents of meditation, the thing that is
> > supposed
> > > > to free them from attachment and make their
> > lives
> > > > bliss, are *still* obsessing on Skolnick and
> > rubbing
> > > > their cyberhands together with glee as they plot
> > > > how to destroy him and his reputation. The only
> > > > thing that has changed for them in all these
> > years
> > > > is now they try equally hard to destroy Chopra
> > and
> > > > *his* reputation as well.
> > > >
> > > > Sure speaks volumes about the value of TM, eh?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I was more impressed with the ability of certain
> > "sidhas" 
> > > to predict and make movie reviews they hadn't seen
> > using 
> > > the power of the unified field of all the laws of
> > nature. 
> > > It was SO coherent! I felt so peaceful just
> > hearing them.
> > 
> > If you like coherence, check out Willytex's comment
> > to Paul's latest blog entry over on TM-Free. In it
> > he says, 
> > 
> > > So, Paul, you're saying that Mahesh was in 
> > > Calcutta with the Shankaracharya, Swami 
> > > Brahmanand Saraswati, when the Guru sat up 
> > > in bed with his legs crossed and took his 
> > > last breath.
> > > 
> > > And, you're saying that after the Swami 
> > > expired, Mahesh took the body and put it on 
> > > a train and sent it to Kashi.
> > > 
> > > Then Mahesh put the upright-sitting body in a 
> > > concrete trunk and sank it in the Ganges River 
> > > in front of a large group of people.
> > > 
> > > And you're saying that after that, the Mahesh 
> > > took the Guru's sandals, his high chair, his 
> > > umbrella, and other official accoutrements, 
> > > including all the land and buildings at 
> > > Jyotirmath and gave them to Shantanand, who he 
> > > then installed on the Gaddi at Jyotirmath.
> > 
> > The hilarious thing is that Paul said NONE of those
> > things in the blog entry Willytex is responding to. 
> > Not one of them.
> > 
> > Now I think we all know that Willy's got a few
> > linger-
> > ing mental problems from all that prairie dog
> > poontang 
> > he's been tasting, but he does present himself as an
> > On The Program TMer. So doesn't THAT just give you a
> > 
> > warm feeling of peace and serenity?
> > 
> > > OK, it was laughter, but that's bliss, right?
> > 
> > Damn straight. Laughter is always a good thing.
> > 
> > I was kinda expecting what's-her-name to jump into
> > the 
> > Firefly vs. Babylon 5 debate. After all, she would
> > feel 
> > imminently qualified to do so, having seen neither
> > series.
> > 
> > > They don't seem as good at going back in
> > time...but then 
> > > again, the movie review siddhi twasn't dat good
> > either...
> > 
> > I don't know...being able to review films you've
> > never seen gives you a *tremendous* advantage over
> > other film critics. You could call yourself The
> > Blindfolded Film Reviewer and beat Ebert to the
> > punch
> > every time. 
> > 
> > And, when someone mentions that The Blindfolded Film
> > Reviewer included some elements in her review that
> > weren't in the film AT ALL, she can just scream at
> > them and make up stories about them. Hey! that
> > approach
> > has worked wonders for Rush Limbaugh, so I'm betting
> > that The Blindfolded Film Reviewer show will be a 
> > big hit.
> > 
> > The first films reviewed will be:
> > 
> > * "Inland Empire" (2006) -- a glowing, positive
> > review, 
> > stressing the filmmaker's...um...coherence and
> > aversion 
> > to the violence that The Blindfolded Film Reviewer
> > finds 
> > so abhorent. 
> > 
> > * "One: The Movie" (2005) -- a *scathing* review of
> > this
> > New Age film, stressing the appearance of Deepak
> > Chopra,
> > Ram Dass, Thich Nhat Hahn, Robert Thurman, and
> > others
> > she will refer to as "spiritual lightweights," while
> > blasting the filmmaker for not including Maharishi.
> > 
> > * "How I Won the War" (1967) -- again, a real
> > new-asshole-
> > ripper of a review of this film in its re-release,
> > stress-
> > ing Lennon's obvious stress upon leaving Rishikesh
> > and
> > saying the things he did back then, and his lack of
> > coherence 
> > for making such a strongly pro-war film.
> > 
> > * "Boogie Nights" (1997) -- another positive review
> > this
> > time, stressing Heather Graham's contributions to
> > the film,
> > and how her TM-inspired...uh...perkiness added to
> > its 
> > overall coherence and general sense of family
> > values.
> > 
> > * "Candy Baby" (1969) -- the best review of all, for
> > what
> > will be obvious reasons if you check out its IMDB
> > page at:
> > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0182866/  Similar
> > positive
> > reviews will be made for "Aliens from Spaceship
> > Earth" 
> > (1977) and "Romeo und Julia 70" (1969), for the same
> > reason. There can, after all, be no better
> > recommendation
> > for a film than it containing a cameo by not only an
> > enlightened being, but the MOST enlightened, BESTEST
> > spiritual teacher in all of recorded history, on any
> > planet anywhere in this universe or any other. 
> > 
> > :-)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > --------------------~--> 
> > See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
> >
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/0It09A/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
~->
> > 
> > 
> > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Or go to: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > and click 'Join This Group!' 
> > Yahoo! Groups - Join or create groups, clubs, forums
> > &amp; communities. Links
> > 
> > 
> === message truncated ===
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
______________________________________________________________________
______________
> TV dinner still cooling? 
> Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/
>


Reply via email to