--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> > > You're enlightened, and you refuse to even *think*
> > > that you might not be. Did I get that right, Jim?
> > >
> > You are missing what I and many others have already said again 
and 
> > again here. Enlightenment is not experienced on the level of 
> thinking. 
> > It is a state of Being. This is not my original expression-- All 
of 
> > the gurus and spiritual teachers say this also. Given your 
> background, 
> > I am surprised that you don't know this yet. Your level of 
> ignorance 
> > astounds me.:-)
> 
> It's a little like accusing somebody of refusing
> even to *think* they might be dreaming rather
> than awake. When you're awake, it's self-evident
> you aren't dreaming. (Not "self-evident" meaning
> "obvious," but rather evident in terms of itself.)
>
That's a perfect analogy- Thanks!:-)

Reply via email to