I'm trying to be impartial about this -- while the news footage looks
incriminating, it's true that there aren't any shots of where the cats
were actually living, and vindictiveness has been known to happen among
different factions of the rescue community.  If the accusations against
Kelley turn out to be false, she wouldn't be the first animal advocate
to be persecuted unjustly.  And while news is *supposed* to be
impartial, we all know it is so very NOT.  And this news report is from
Fox, arguably the most blatantly biased and sensationalistic news source
in the universe.  The cats shown did not look to be in distress.  Given
that they were supposedly filmed a few days after the seizure, that also
makes me wonder why Fox wasn't right on the spot at the time of the
seizure.  Seems strange that they waited a few days to do the story if
it was that horrendous a seizure.  They're usually all over that kind of
thing.
 
That being said, I truly would like to know the story behind the dead
cat in the closet and the dying one in the kitchen.  Even if Kelley's
home is not as bad as the news story painted it, the fact of these two
untended kitties would suggest that Kelley has more than she can
properly care for.  
 
Diane R.

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Belinda Sauro
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: detailed video of seizure


   OH really how about the high and mighty Dan Rather getting fired over
a story that was completely fabricated, come on open your eyes the news
is very baised about what they report and they love to twist things to
be the way they want them to be ... 

        regardless of people's feelings for Susan OR Kelly, the fact
remains that this story was done by a reputable news organization. The
story isn't "made up."

PS.  With all the political corruptness in the world how can you be so
naive?  Just because someone is a judge or vet or any other professional
doesn't make them honest.


        If you don't believe anyone involved in the story, logic would
demand that you trust the impartial judge in the case to have made the
right decision in not allowing any more animals back in the home (with
the exception of three personal cats).

I stand by what I said, when they do a story here about this type of
thing, they show the inside of the house they raid and back up what they
are saying.

It's funny how Susan has been absent from the list until she had someone
to tear apart again.  Speaks volumes  ...

-- 

Belinda
happiness is being owned by cats ...

Be-Mi-Kitties
http://bemikitties.com

Post Adoptable FeLV/FIV/FIP Cats/Kittens
http://adopt.bemikitties.com

FeLV Candlelight Service
http://bemikitties.com/cls

HostDesign4U.com [affordable hosting & web design]
http://HostDesign4U.com

------------

BMK Designs [non-profit animals websites]
http://bmk.bemikitties.com

This electronic mail transmission and any attachments are confidential and may 
be privileged.  
They should be read or retained only by the intended recipient.  If you have 
received this 
transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
transmission from 
your system.  In addition, in order to comply with Treasury Circular 230, we 
are required to 
inform you that unless we have specifically stated to the contrary in writing, 
any advice we 
provide in this email or any attachment concerning federal tax issues or 
submissions is not 
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, to avoid federal tax 
penalties.

Reply via email to