I didn't even have to finish reading what you wrote because I think
you meant this email for Susan, opps I forgot she is a friend of yours.
I was not attacking you in any way I simply stated a fact Dan Rather was
fired for putting a story on that was false and made up without checking
the facts or the sources and being a judge or vet or any other
professional doesn't make anyone automatically an honest person. I am
not a negative person so I don't have a clue where that came from. Get
your facts straight before you post nonsense please ....
PS. Maybe you can point out to me where exactly I attacked you in this
PSS. Susan is the bully, opps forgot again she is a friend of yours ...
darn gotta remember that!!
OH really how about the high and mighty Dan Rather getting fired
over a story that was completely fabricated, come on open your eyes
the news is very baised about what they report and they love to twist
things to be the way they want them to be ...
regardless of people's feelings for Susan OR Kelly, the fact remains
that this story was done by a reputable news organization. The story
isn't "made up."
*PS. * With all the political corruptness in the world how can you be
so naive? Just because someone is a judge or vet or any other
professional doesn't make them honest.
If you don't believe anyone involved in the story, logic would demand
that you trust the impartial judge in the case to have made the right
decision in not allowing any more animals back in the home (with the
exception of three personal cats).
I stand by what I said, when they do a story here where I live in
Washington about this type of thing, they show the inside of the house
they raid and back up what they are saying.
It's funny how Susan has been absent from the list until she had
someone to tear apart again. Speaks volumes ...
I know and even belong to groups like this and they moderate everyone
that may not see things the way they do so a lot of posts don't get
through, no thanks.
Does this group not have a moderator? I assure you, as small as my
group is, this kind of thing is not and would not be tolerated. You
have been so negative. Both here and on other lists we are both on.
I don't get it. I don't understand how this type of behavior is
benefitting you. What do you get out of it?
Any judge who thought there was a real problem and was a serious animal
lover wouldn't have given ANY of the animals back if he/she thought the
person was a danger to them, at least I would hope that is the case.
How the hell is it so easy to look over the fact that a judge agreed
with animal control on the situation? Contrary to what you want to
believe, I seriously doubt animal control had a vendetta against Kelly.
Actually I think they had to cover their own butt but I won't go into it
because no matter what I say, it is not going to mesh with Susan's story
so therefore can't be true.
Never said I didn't like her, don't know her, only what I see of her on
this list and she is a trouble maker period, where has she been for 6
months until she could start bashing someone?
Oh and by the way, I accidentally posted that to the list because your
right I wouldn't do that on a public forum so for that I apologize, for
the fact that what I said is true I don't.
I hope that email you sent to Jim gets some attention, indeed, because
I absolutely will be unsubscribing after this.
Where you at the hearing Michael or are you repeating what someone told
you?? Just curious.
Oh and I guess your list isn't bashing the hell out of Kelley with no
proof or verdict yet is it, ya that's the American way isn't it???
I'm a very spiritual person and like to believe in the American way that
everyone is innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty, that doesn't seem to be the
case anymore in America.
PSSSS. There really wasn't anything too detailed about that video I
happiness is being owned by cats ...
Post Adoptable FeLV/FIV/FIP Cats/Kittens
FeLV Candlelight Service
HostDesign4U.com [affordable hosting & web design]
BMK Designs [non-profit animals websites]