see, i would say keep them together, because they've probably already been
as exposed as they're gonna be, and if mom is negative, it means their
exposure is probably from great-aunt tabby, the neighborhood nursemaid. we
don't really know for sure how FeLV works in kittens who don't get it from
their moms, nor if a mom who is negative after birth was positive in early
pregnancy but passed it out of her system while pregnant, or if she DID do
that, if maybe she passed some of her strong-enough-to-do-that immunities on
to the babies! mom's being negative, tho, is a very good sign for the
strength of the genetic side of things..... and with four negatives already,
you may just have come in on the tail end of the exposure curve on that
one....

(yes, i DO tend to be more optimistic, because when only 30% of cats who
test positive remain infected, and vaccinated cats who are really negative
don't ever seem to get the virus even when in close proximity with other
cats, well, i am nowhere near as frightened of the CONTAGION element of this
virus than i used to be. the results of it, when activated? that's a
different story altogether.

MC

-- 
Spay & Neuter Your Neighbors!
Maybe That'll Make The Difference....

MaryChristine
Special-Needs Coordinator, Purebred Cat Breed Rescue (www.purebredcats.org)
Member, SCAT (Special-Cat Action Team)
_______________________________________________
Felvtalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org

Reply via email to