On 9 May 2004 at 4:14, Darcy James Argue wrote: > On 09 May 2004, at 04:09 AM, d. collins wrote: > > > Thanks again for all the valuable tips and advice, especially to > > Hal, who sent me a few sample files. > > > > Here's what I ended up doing for now, with the ossia tool: > > > > http://www.philomela.net/ex/range_finders.gif > > > > It might be considered a bit ambiguous, since the notes of the range > > are to be read in the clef that follow them, and not in that of the > > incipit. > > It confused the hell out of me, even after you explained it. However, > I'm not familiar with this style, so maybe it wouldn't be confusing to > someone well versed in it.
It's very, very confusing. The usual practice is to put the range finder after the real clef, but before the time signature: http://www.bway.net/~dfenton/RangeFinder.gif > Keeping that in mind, I vote for the third clef (before the range > finders), definitely. Whatever you do, convention or not, should be unambiguous. Putting the ranged finders next to the incipit and in the clef that follows is inherently confusing. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
