> It's an *image file*, which is not able to be harvested by web > spiders. It's there for actual humans who click over to that page, but > it is in NO WAY "readily available."
I know what you mean but I think you're overestimating the security of that image. OCR exists, and spammers are conttinually improving it otherwise why the attempts at BaffleText and the like (this is clearly not up to that standard). The voice of reason in me simply says that we should do what we can to protect our privacy. I'm not pretending we can do this 100%, just that like everything else in life we should try. If people want searchable archives and RSS then let's find a solution that doesn't include this guy (opensubscriber.com) who clearly just wants his GoogleAds revenue at the expense of my privacy. Simon Troup Digital Music Art _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
