On 12-04-2011 04:13, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > > Adriano, I do not wnat nitpicking. Moreover, I agree that my commit was > (not to say more) bad. But your initial solution with non-POD objects > in API was also bad. I have not understood - do you see problems with > replacing C++ classes with POD objects, i.e. structures, in interface? > No, I don't, but I just don't think it's a requirement to eliminate trivial inline constructors and methods, cause they aren't really a problem.
We will have a C++ class derived from it that may have more code. Adriano PS: I'd say the same discussion applies to MultipleTransaction. We don't need it. We need a plain struct with attachment, tpb and tpbLength, and pass an array and a counter to the function. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
