On 11-04-2011 07:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > >> PS Alex will explain you why "struct" or "class with data members" is >> bad for *portable* code. > > Taking into an account Dmirty's sample with XSQLDA I must say that may > be not everything SO bad in this area. At least somehow it did work all > this time. What is problematic - how to add something to such structures? > Nothing is going to be added to this struct. If we need to add something (batch?) to it must be done now.
Saying what can be added to it in the future is like saying what if we need to add parameters to existing functions. Just should not be done this way. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
