On 11-04-2011 13:25, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > On 04/11/11 20:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 11-04-2011 13:15, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >>> On 04/11/11 19:53, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >>>> On 11-04-2011 07:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >>>>>> PS Alex will explain you why "struct" or "class with data members" is >>>>>> bad for *portable* code. >>>>> Taking into an account Dmirty's sample with XSQLDA I must say that may >>>>> be not everything SO bad in this area. At least somehow it did work all >>>>> this time. What is problematic - how to add something to such structures? >>>>> >>>> Nothing is going to be added to this struct. If we need to add something >>>> (batch?) to it must be done now. >>>> >>> And what if we need some "superbatch" in FB4? >>> >> What is it? > > Pay attention at quotes :-) > This is some feature we do not know today about. >
I'd ask you why you would need to insert this unknown feature in message buffer, which is just a pack of messagePtr/messageLength/blrPtr/blrLength. And I'd ask you too what about if this unknown feature is related to all methods that don't have message buffers. Sorry, but if you want nitpicking, I can continue which such type of question. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
